State ex rel. Cherrington v. Hutsinpiller

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 280

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Cherrington v. Hutsinpiller. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Ohio St. 468 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1925·No. No. 19039·Published

Opinion

DAY, J.

. . _ , ■ The municipalities of this state have no power, by charter or otherwise, to create courts and appoint judges thereof, such exercise of power being in violation of Sectionl, and SectionlO, Article IV. of the Constitution of Ohio.

Judgment of ouster.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur. Kinkate, J., not participating.

such ordinance must be pleaded and upon trial its existence at the time of the injury must be proved.

Judgment reversed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Day, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAY, J.

Judgment of ouster.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur. Kinkate, J., not participating.

such ordinance must be pleaded and upon trial its existence at the time of the injury must be proved.

Judgment reversed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Day, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.

State ex rel. Cherrington v. Hutsinpiller, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 280 (Ohio 1925).

Pincite

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 280 (State ex rel. Cherrington v. Hutsinpiller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.