State ex rel. Chenowith v. Chenowith
This text of 637 P.2d 641 (State ex rel. Chenowith v. Chenowith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation granted after a prior finding of contempt for wilful nonsupport. The trial judge made certain findings of fact in revoking probation. As the state here concedes, one of those findings — that defendant had held no job for the past four years — was incorrect. We reverse and remand with instructions to reconsider the decision to revoke probation in light of this corrected view of the facts.1
Reversed and remanded with instructions to reconsider the decision to revoke probation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
637 P.2d 641, 55 Or. App. 267, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 4063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-chenowith-v-chenowith-orctapp-1981.