State ex rel. Chapman v. Thomas

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Chapman v. Thomas

2002 Ohio 73, 94 Ohio St. 3d 38

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 9, 2002

Docket2001-0855

StatusPublished

This text of 2002 Ohio 73 (State ex rel. Chapman v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Chapman v. Thomas, 2002 Ohio 73, 94 Ohio St. 3d 38 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 38.]

THE STATE EX REL. CHAPMAN, APPELLANT, v. THOMAS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Chapman v. Thomas, 2002-Ohio-73.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-855—Submitted November 13, 2001—Decided January 9, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-651. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Stephen E. Mindzak Law Offices, L.L.C., and Stephen E. Mindzak, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Bass, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 38.]

THE STATE EX REL. CHAPMAN, APPELLANT, v. THOMAS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Chapman v. Thomas, 2002-Ohio-73.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-855—Submitted November 13, 2001—Decided January 9, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-651. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Stephen E. Mindzak Law Offices, L.L.C., and Stephen E. Mindzak, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Erica L. Bass, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2002 Ohio 73, 94 Ohio St. 3d 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-chapman-v-thomas-ohio-2002.