State ex rel. Chapman v. Connick

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Chapman v. Connick

633 So. 2d 160, 1994 La. LEXIS 338, 1994 WL 34685

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 4, 1994·No. No. 94-KH-0044·Published

Opinion

In re Chapman, Jerry; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 307-947.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed over 30 days ago. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

HALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Chapman, Jerry; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 307-947.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed over 30 days ago. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

HALL, J., not on panel.

State ex rel. Chapman v. Connick, 633 So. 2d 160, 1994 La. LEXIS 338, 1994 WL 34685 (La. 1994).

Pincite

633 So. 2d 160 (State ex rel. Chapman v. Connick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.