State ex rel. Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Court of Appeals for Franklin Cty.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Court of Appeals for Franklin Cty.

784 N.E.2d 706, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1472

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 5, 2003

Docket2003-0063

StatusPublished

This text of 784 N.E.2d 706 (State ex rel. Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Court of Appeals for Franklin Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Court of Appeals for Franklin Cty., 784 N.E.2d 706, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1472 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, relator’s motion for emergency stay, motion to intervene of Common Cause/Ohio, motions to dismiss of respondents Franklin County Court of Appeals and Ohio Elections Commission and its members, and relator’s motion for admission pro hac vice.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that relator’s motion for emergency stay be, and hereby is, DENIED.

Resnick and Cook, JJ., not participating.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of Common Cause/Ohio be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and that it be, and hereby is, permitted to intervene as a respondent.

Resnick and Cook, JJ., not participating.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions of respondents Franklin County Court of Appeals and the Ohio Elections Commission and its members be, and hereby are, GRANTED, and that the cause be, and hereby is, DISMISSED. This renders moot relator’s motion for admission pro hac vice.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Moyer, C. J., concurs except that he would grant the motion for admission pro hac vice. Resnick and Cook, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, relator’s motion for emergency stay, motion to intervene of Common Cause/Ohio, motions to dismiss of respondents Franklin County Court of Appeals and Ohio Elections Commission and its members, and relator’s motion for admission pro hac vice.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that relator’s motion for emergency stay be, and hereby is, DENIED.

Resnick and Cook, JJ., not participating.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of Common Cause/Ohio be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and that it be, and hereby is, permitted to intervene as a respondent.

Resnick and Cook, JJ., not participating.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions of respondents Franklin County Court of Appeals and the Ohio Elections Commission and its members be, and hereby are, GRANTED, and that the cause be, and hereby is, DISMISSED. This renders moot relator’s motion for admission pro hac vice.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Moyer, C. J., concurs except that he would grant the motion for admission pro hac vice. Resnick and Cook, JJ., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

784 N.E.2d 706, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-chamber-of-commerce-of-the-united-states-v-court-of-appeals-ohio-2003.