State ex rel. Chalender v. Shoemaker

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Chalender v. Shoemaker

766 N.E.2d 995, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1026

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 22, 2002

Docket2002-0493

StatusPublished

This text of 766 N.E.2d 995 (State ex rel. Chalender v. Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Chalender v. Shoemaker, 766 N.E.2d 995, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1026 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss and relators’ motion for stay of Court of Claims proceedings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, granted and this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss and relators’ motion for stay of Court of Claims proceedings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, granted and this cause is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

766 N.E.2d 995, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-chalender-v-shoemaker-ohio-2002.