State ex rel. Chaffins v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Chaffins v. Industrial Commission

695 N.E.2d 253, 82 Ohio St. 3d 268

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1998

DocketNo. 95-2303

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 695 N.E.2d 253 (State ex rel. Chaffins v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Chaffins v. Industrial Commission, 695 N.E.2d 253, 82 Ohio St. 3d 268 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In State ex rel Nicholls v. Indus. Comm. (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 454, 692 N.E.2d 188, we held that the possibility of unspecified error is not a proper basis for the exercise of reconsideration jurisdiction. The commission, therefore, abused its discretion in vacating the August 2,1993 regional board and October 6, 1993 staff hearing officers’ orders in which wage loss compensation was awarded. Given this determination, we find it unnecessary to address claimant’s remaining propositions.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the writ is granted.

Judgment reversed and writ granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI