State ex rel. Chaffins v. Industrial Commission

695 N.E.2d 253, 82 Ohio St. 3d 268
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1998·No. No. 95-2303·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In State ex rel Nicholls v. Indus. Comm. (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 454, 692 N.E.2d 188, we held that the possibility of unspecified error is not a proper basis for the exercise of reconsideration jurisdiction. The commission, therefore, abused its discretion in vacating the August 2,1993 regional board and October 6, 1993 staff hearing officers’ orders in which wage loss compensation was awarded. Given this determination, we find it unnecessary to address claimant’s remaining propositions.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the writ is granted.

Judgment reversed and writ granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Chaffins v. Industrial Commission, 695 N.E.2d 253, 82 Ohio St. 3d 268 (Ohio 1998).

695 N.E.2d 253 (State ex rel. Chaffins v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related