State ex rel. Chaachou v. Kelly

137 So. 2d 249
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 1962·No. No. 62-33·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of habeas corpus the petitioner alleges that he is incarcerated in the County Jail pursuant to an alleged illegal sentence imposed January 17, 1962. The errors alleged are matters which may properly be raised by appeal. A habeas corpus proceeding cannot be employed as a substitute for relief by appeal.

The writ is, therefore, discharged and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the respondent, but without prejudice to any rights which the petitioner may have to present by appeal to the proper court the alleged errors relied upon in the petition.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Chaachou v. Kelly, 137 So. 2d 249 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

137 So. 2d 249 (State ex rel. Chaachou v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooke v. United States
267 U.S. 517 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Dykes v. Dykes
104 So. 2d 598 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
State Ex Rel. Giblin v. Sullivan
26 So. 2d 509 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1946)
Baumgartner v. Joughin
141 So. 185 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
State Ex Rel. Grebstein v. Lehman
129 So. 818 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)