State Ex Rel. Cedeno v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Cedeno v. Industrial Commission

2010 Ohio 5677, 127 Ohio St. 3d 212

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 24, 2010·No. 2009-1777·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

*213 Plevin & Gallucci and Frank Gallucci III; and Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Colleen C. Erdman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

*213 Plevin & Gallucci and Frank Gallucci III; and Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Colleen C. Erdman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

State Ex Rel. Cedeno v. Industrial Commission, 2010 Ohio 5677, 127 Ohio St. 3d 212 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

2010 Ohio 5677 (State Ex Rel. Cedeno v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.