State Ex Rel. Cedeno v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Cedeno v. Industrial Commission

2010 Ohio 5677, 127 Ohio St. 3d 212

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 24, 2010

Docket2009-1777

StatusPublished

This text of 2010 Ohio 5677 (State Ex Rel. Cedeno v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Cedeno v. Industrial Commission, 2010 Ohio 5677, 127 Ohio St. 3d 212 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

*213 Plevin & Gallucci and Frank Gallucci III; and Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Colleen C. Erdman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

*213 Plevin & Gallucci and Frank Gallucci III; and Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers, for appellant. Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Colleen C. Erdman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2010 Ohio 5677, 127 Ohio St. 3d 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cedeno-v-industrial-commission-ohio-2010.