State ex rel. Casualty Co. of America v. Muench

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Casualty Co. of America v. Muench

143 S.W. 500, 239 Mo. 191, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 74

DecidedJanuary 27, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.W. 500 (State ex rel. Casualty Co. of America v. Muench) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Casualty Co. of America v. Muench, 143 S.W. 500, 239 Mo. 191, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 74 (Mo. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODSON, J.

— By stipulation of parties, this case was submitted with the case of. State ex rel. Pacific Mutual Life. Insurance Company v. Grimm, decided by this court, In Banc, at the present term, and reported at page 135.

There is no difference between the substantial .facts of the two cases; and having reached the conclusion in that case that the peremptory writ of prohibition prayed for should be denied, and that the preliminary rule heretofore issued should be quashed, we, are, therefore, of the opinion that a similar judgment should be rendered in this case. It is so ordered.

All concur except Valliant, G. J., and Graves, J., who dissent in a separate opinion by the latter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODSON, J.

— By stipulation of parties, this case was submitted with the case of. State ex rel. Pacific Mutual Life. Insurance Company v. Grimm, decided by this court, In Banc, at the present term, and reported at page 135.

There is no difference between the substantial .facts of the two cases; and having reached the conclusion in that case that the peremptory writ of prohibition prayed for should be denied, and that the preliminary rule heretofore issued should be quashed, we, are, therefore, of the opinion that a similar judgment should be rendered in this case. It is so ordered.

All concur except Valliant, G. J., and Graves, J., who dissent in a separate opinion by the latter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.W. 500, 239 Mo. 191, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-casualty-co-of-america-v-muench-mo-1912.