State, Ex Rel. Caston v. Brindle

191 N.E. 99, 128 Ohio St. 260, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 260, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 316
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 18, 1934
Docket24675
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 191 N.E. 99 (State, Ex Rel. Caston v. Brindle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State, Ex Rel. Caston v. Brindle, 191 N.E. 99, 128 Ohio St. 260, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 260, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 316 (Ohio 1934).

Opinion

This cause came on to "be heard upon the demurrer of the respondent to the relator’s petition, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the demurrer be, and the same is hereby, sustained on authority of Cullen, Vice Mayor, v. State, ex rel. City of Toledo, 105 Ohio St., 545.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that a writ of mandamus be, and the same hereby is, denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Stanley v. Cook
66 N.E.2d 207 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1946)
State Ex Rel. Kunick v. Urner
18 N.E.2d 607 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 N.E. 99, 128 Ohio St. 260, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 260, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-caston-v-brindle-ohio-1934.