State, Ex Rel. Caston v. Brindle

191 N.E. 99, 128 Ohio St. 260, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 260, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 316
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 1934·No. 24675·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This cause came on to "be heard upon the demurrer of the respondent to the relator’s petition, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the demurrer be, and the same is hereby, sustained on authority of Cullen, Vice Mayor, v. State, ex rel. City of Toledo, 105 Ohio St., 545.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that a writ of mandamus be, and the same hereby is, denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State, Ex Rel. Caston v. Brindle, 191 N.E. 99, 128 Ohio St. 260, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 260, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 316 (Ohio 1934).

191 N.E. 99 (State, Ex Rel. Caston v. Brindle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Stanley v. Cook
66 N.E.2d 207 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1946)
State Ex Rel. Kunick v. Urner
18 N.E.2d 607 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1939)