State ex rel. Cassill v. Neville

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cassill v. Neville

61 Mont. 617

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 23, 1921

DocketNos. 4,975 and 4,977

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Mont. 617 (State ex rel. Cassill v. Neville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cassill v. Neville, 61 Mont. 617 (Mo. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— This being return day on above applica-. tions for writs of habeas corpus to fix bail, counsel for the [618]*618respective parties appeared and argued the applications, whereupon, after due consideration, it is ordered that a joint and several bond be furnished in the sum of $13,000, conditioned as provided by law, and that either or both of the defendants will appear and submit himself or themselves to the court for execution of judgment in case the judgment in either or both causes be affirmed on appeal; said bond to be approved by the clerk of the district court of Powell county.

Mr. C. A. Spaulding and Mr. W. F. Iieeley, for Relator. Mr. Wellington D. Rankin, Attorney General, Mr. L. A. Foot, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. F. J. Cummins, County Attorney of Powell County, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

— This being return day on above applica-. tions for writs of habeas corpus to fix bail, counsel for the [618]*618respective parties appeared and argued the applications, whereupon, after due consideration, it is ordered that a joint and several bond be furnished in the sum of $13,000, conditioned as provided by law, and that either or both of the defendants will appear and submit himself or themselves to the court for execution of judgment in case the judgment in either or both causes be affirmed on appeal; said bond to be approved by the clerk of the district court of Powell county.

Mr. C. A. Spaulding and Mr. W. F. Iieeley, for Relator. Mr. Wellington D. Rankin, Attorney General, Mr. L. A. Foot, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. F. J. Cummins, County Attorney of Powell County, for Respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Mont. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cassill-v-neville-mont-1921.