State ex rel. Carter v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Carter v. State

576 So. 2d 37, 1991 La. LEXIS 582, 1991 WL 30028

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 La. LEXIS 191 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 4, 1991·No. No. 91-KH-0214·Published

Opinion

In re Carter, Joshua; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 172-968.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed in January of 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon [38]*38the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Carter, Joshua; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 172-968.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed in January of 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon [38]*38the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State ex rel. Carter v. State, 576 So. 2d 37, 1991 La. LEXIS 582, 1991 WL 30028 (La. 1991).

Pincite

576 So. 2d 37 (State ex rel. Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.