State ex rel. Carter v. Ormsby

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Carter v. Ormsby

559 N.E.2d 1359, 53 Ohio St. 3d 262, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1041

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 12, 1990

DocketNo. 90-420

StatusPublished

This text of 559 N.E.2d 1359 (State ex rel. Carter v. Ormsby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Carter v. Ormsby, 559 N.E.2d 1359, 53 Ohio St. 3d 262, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1041 (Ohio 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. In his brief, appellant raises several other matters unrelated to the underlying action, and we decline to consider them except for one. Appellant argues that he had a constitutional right to an oral evidentiary hearing despite Local Rule 2(A) of the Third District Court of Appeals, which requires consent of the court for oral testimony in original actions, except habeas corpus cases. We hold that appellant, a convicted and incarcerated felon, had no absolute right to appear in person in the cause. See In re Colburn (1987), 30 Ohio St. 3d 141, 30 OBR 452, 507 N.E. 2d 1138.

Appellant’s motions to strike appellee’s brief and exhibit, motion for injunction, motion to transmit records and documents, motion for production of documents, and requests for documents are overruled. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re SNICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. In his brief, appellant raises several other matters unrelated to the underlying action, and we decline to consider them except for one. Appellant argues that he had a constitutional right to an oral evidentiary hearing despite Local Rule 2(A) of the Third District Court of Appeals, which requires consent of the court for oral testimony in original actions, except habeas corpus cases. We hold that appellant, a convicted and incarcerated felon, had no absolute right to appear in person in the cause. See In re Colburn (1987), 30 Ohio St. 3d 141, 30 OBR 452, 507 N.E. 2d 1138.

Appellant’s motions to strike appellee’s brief and exhibit, motion for injunction, motion to transmit records and documents, motion for production of documents, and requests for documents are overruled. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re SNICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 N.E.2d 1359, 53 Ohio St. 3d 262, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-carter-v-ormsby-ohio-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack