State ex rel. Carson v. Lake Criminal Court
156 N.E.2d 383, 239 Ind. 700, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 222
Opinion
The petitioner seeks a Writ oí Mandamus against the respondent Judge. The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35, which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which the petition is based to be filed with the petition and that the petition be verified.
For the reasons stated the petition is denied.
Note.—Reported in 156 N. E. 2d 383.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Carson v. Lake Criminal Court, 156 N.E.2d 383, 239 Ind. 700, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 222 (Ind. 1959).
156 N.E.2d 383 (State ex rel. Carson v. Lake Criminal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mooney v. State
156 N.E.2d 383 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1959)