State ex rel. Carson v. Lake Criminal Court

156 N.E.2d 383, 239 Ind. 700, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 222
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 3, 1959
DocketNo. 0-546
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 N.E.2d 383 (State ex rel. Carson v. Lake Criminal Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Carson v. Lake Criminal Court, 156 N.E.2d 383, 239 Ind. 700, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 222 (Ind. 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam

The petitioner seeks a Writ Mandamus against the respondent Judge. The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35, which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which the petition is based to be filed with the petition and that the petition be verified.

For the reasons stated the petition is denied.

Note.—Reported in 156 N. E. 2d 383.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mooney v. State
156 N.E.2d 383 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.E.2d 383, 239 Ind. 700, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-carson-v-lake-criminal-court-ind-1959.