State Ex Rel. Carson v. Bateman

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Carson v. Bateman

180 So. 22, 131 Fla. 625

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 3, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 180 So. 22 (State Ex Rel. Carson v. Bateman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Carson v. Bateman, 180 So. 22, 131 Fla. 625 (Fla. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The alternative writ of mandamus herein issued from this court commanded the respondent members of the Board of Public Instruction for Liberty County, Florida, to instanter convene as such Board and reinstate relators as teachers in the public school at Hosford, Florida, in Special Tax School District No. 6 of Liberty County, for the school- year 1937-1938, and to contract with them for their services as such teachers, and commanded the *626 respondent County Superintendent of Public Instruction of Liberty County, Florida, to do and perform all acts necessary on his part to effectuate the carrying out of the other commands of the writ, or to show cause for not doing so.

A motion to quash the alternative writ was denied with leave to answer, in order that a full showing may be made of the rights asserted. Upon the filing of the answer, relators moved for a peremptory writ notwithstanding the answer; and if such averments are legally sufficient as a defense to the writ, a peremptory writ should be denied.

Upon consideration of the record it appears that the asserted rights of the relators to be employed as teachers have not been shown to be clearly established for enforcement by mandamus; that the teaching force of the district has been in operation for a large portion of the school term in general accord with a peremptory writ of. mandamus issued by the Circuit Court; and that the issue of a peremptory writ herein would cause confusion in the work of the schools to the detriment of the public welfare.

The court may refuse a peremptory writ of mandamus upon equitable considerations affecting the general good of the community where such considerations preponderate against an asserted right to the writ that is not clearly established. If relators have contract rights they may be reversed in appropriate actions.

Peremptory writ is denied and the cause is dismissed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, 'Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Buford, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The alternative writ of mandamus herein issued from this court commanded the respondent members of the Board of Public Instruction for Liberty County, Florida, to instanter convene as such Board and reinstate relators as teachers in the public school at Hosford, Florida, in Special Tax School District No. 6 of Liberty County, for the school- year 1937-1938, and to contract with them for their services as such teachers, and commanded the *626 respondent County Superintendent of Public Instruction of Liberty County, Florida, to do and perform all acts necessary on his part to effectuate the carrying out of the other commands of the writ, or to show cause for not doing so.

A motion to quash the alternative writ was denied with leave to answer, in order that a full showing may be made of the rights asserted. Upon the filing of the answer, relators moved for a peremptory writ notwithstanding the answer; and if such averments are legally sufficient as a defense to the writ, a peremptory writ should be denied.

Upon consideration of the record it appears that the asserted rights of the relators to be employed as teachers have not been shown to be clearly established for enforcement by mandamus; that the teaching force of the district has been in operation for a large portion of the school term in general accord with a peremptory writ of. mandamus issued by the Circuit Court; and that the issue of a peremptory writ herein would cause confusion in the work of the schools to the detriment of the public welfare.

The court may refuse a peremptory writ of mandamus upon equitable considerations affecting the general good of the community where such considerations preponderate against an asserted right to the writ that is not clearly established. If relators have contract rights they may be reversed in appropriate actions.

Peremptory writ is denied and the cause is dismissed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, 'Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur. Buford, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 So. 22, 131 Fla. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-carson-v-bateman-fla-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack