State ex rel. Carr v. McDonnell

2009 Ohio 6165, 918 N.E.2d 1004, 124 Ohio St. 3d 62
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 1, 2009
Docket2009-1020
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2009 Ohio 6165 (State ex rel. Carr v. McDonnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Carr v. McDonnell, 2009 Ohio 6165, 918 N.E.2d 1004, 124 Ohio St. 3d 62 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint of appellant, Leonard F. Carr, for a writ of prohibition to prevent appellee Judge John P. O’Donnell of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas from exercising jurisdiction in Carr v. Acacia Country Club Co., Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas case No. CV-635329, and Carr v. Acacia Country Club Co., Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas case No. CV-682363, and a writ of mandamus to command appellees Judge Nancy McDonnell and Judge Eileen A. Gallagher of that court to transfer those cases from the commercial docket of Judge O’Donnell to the docket of Judge Nancy M. Russo.

{¶ 2} Judge O’Donnell does not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to proceed in these cases. See Temp.Sup.R. 1.03 and 1.04; Sup.R. 4(B) and 36. Carr has an adequate remedy by way of appeal from Judge O’Donnell’s rulings in the cases to raise his claim that Judge O’Donnell was improperly assigned to them. See Keith v. Bobby, 117 Ohio St.3d 470, 2008-Ohio-1443, 884 N.E.2d 1067, ¶ 14; State ex rel. Key v. Spicer (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 469, 746 N.E.2d 1119 (“a claim of improper assignment of a judge can generally be adequately raised by way of appeal”); State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 30, 6 OBR 50, 451 N.E.2d 225 (mandamus and prohibition are not substitutes for appeal to contest alleged improper assignment of judge).

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *63 Leonard F. Carr, L. Bryan Carr, and Robert P. DeMarco, for appellant. Benesch, Friedlander, Copian & Aronoff, L.L.P., Robert A. Zimmerman, and Mark D. Tucker, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Ervin v. Barker
2013 Ohio 376 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
Patel v. Sargus
2011 Ohio 1465 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State ex rel. Williams v. Bessey
2010 Ohio 2113 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 6165, 918 N.E.2d 1004, 124 Ohio St. 3d 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-carr-v-mcdonnell-ohio-2009.