State ex rel. Carpenter v. Mathys
This text of 91 N.W. 114 (State ex rel. Carpenter v. Mathys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Subd. 3, sec. 3069, State. 1898, provides that an appeal may be taken “when an order grants, refuses, continues or modifies a provisional remedy.” The order appealed from herein denies the relator’s motion to limit the subjects as to which he is sought to1 be examined under sec. 4096. It neither’ “grants, refuses, continues or modifies a provisional remedy,” as mentioned in the section first cited, and is therefore not appealable. The fact that the court required the relator to pay costs of motion does not bring the case within the provisions of the statute as it now exists.
By the Court. — The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 N.W. 114, 115 Wis. 31, 1902 Wisc. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-carpenter-v-mathys-wis-1902.