State ex rel. Carlson v. Medin

208 N.W. 404, 50 S.D. 80, 1926 S.D. LEXIS 296
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedApril 16, 1926
DocketFile No. 6200
StatusPublished

This text of 208 N.W. 404 (State ex rel. Carlson v. Medin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Carlson v. Medin, 208 N.W. 404, 50 S.D. 80, 1926 S.D. LEXIS 296 (S.D. 1926).

Opinion

DILLON, J.

This is an original proceeding in which plaintiffs seek to vacate, by certiorari, the order of John T. Medin, judge of the Second judicial circuit of South Dakota, confirming a sale on execution to defendant Frank Haines on the foreclosure of a mortgage.

Under the decision of this court in Casey v. Smith et al., 153 N. W. 918, 36 S. D, 36, an order of confirmation of sale is a final, appealable order. An appeal is the proper remedy for plaintiffs, and certiorari will not lie. It is true that in State ex rel. Kunz v. Campbell, 60 N. W. 32, 3 S. D. 636, this court did entertain a certiorari proceeding under similar circumstances, but in that case the question was not raised as to whether the order in question was an appealable order.

The writ is denied.

MISER, Circuit Judge, sitting in lieu of SHERWOOD, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Kunz v. Campbell
60 N.W. 32 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
Casey v. Smith
153 N.W. 918 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 N.W. 404, 50 S.D. 80, 1926 S.D. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-carlson-v-medin-sd-1926.