State Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Butterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Butterfield

156 N.E. 142, 115 Ohio St. 718, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 718, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 262

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 10, 1926

Docket19935

StatusPublished

This text of 156 N.E. 142 (State Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Butterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Butterfield, 156 N.E. 142, 115 Ohio St. 718, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 718, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 262 (Ohio 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue against the said defendants, directing them to place the name of the above relator on the ballot for candidacy for the office or position of member of the county central committee of the Republican party for Ward 2, Precinct H, of the city of Cincinnati, Hamilton county, Ohio, in the form provided by law.

Writ allowed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur. Day and Kinkade, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue against the said defendants, directing them to place the name of the above relator on the ballot for candidacy for the office or position of member of the county central committee of the Republican party for Ward 2, Precinct H, of the city of Cincinnati, Hamilton county, Ohio, in the form provided by law.

Writ allowed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur. Day and Kinkade, JJ., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 N.E. 142, 115 Ohio St. 718, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 718, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-carlisle-v-butterfield-ohio-1926.