State ex rel. Carlisle Retailers, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 119.]
THE STATE EX REL. CARLISLE RETAILERS, INC., APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; RINYO, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Carlisle Retailers, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-136.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and order of Industrial Commission reinstated. (No. 97-507—Submitted July 15, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD04-464. __________________ Greiner, Carolin & Spector and Thomas M. Carolin, for appellee. Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1998 Ohio 136 (State ex rel. Carlisle Retailers, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.