State Ex Rel. Cannon v. Joughin

126 So. 817, 99 Fla. 691
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 28, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon motion of counsel for relator for a peremptory writ of mandamus notwithstanding the answer and return filed by the respondent and same having been duly considered, and the respondent having averred in his return to the alternative writ issued herein that if a bail bond executed by one or more good and sufficient sureties, whethér the same are individual persons, or a qualified bonding company, con *692 ditioned for the appearance of the relator before the Criminal Court of Record for Hillsborough County, Florida, at 9 o’clock in the forenoon, on Thursday, February 20th, A. D. 1930, and from day to day and from term to term, that he will approve the same and release the relator in conformity with the command of the said alternative writ of mandamus, it is thereupon ordered by the Court that the said motion' for a peremptory writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Cannon v. Joughin, 126 So. 817, 99 Fla. 691 (Fla. 1930).

126 So. 817 (State Ex Rel. Cannon v. Joughin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.