State Ex Rel. Cannon v. Joughin

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Cannon v. Joughin

126 So. 817, 99 Fla. 691

DecidedMarch 28, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 817 (State Ex Rel. Cannon v. Joughin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Cannon v. Joughin, 126 So. 817, 99 Fla. 691 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon motion of counsel for relator for a peremptory writ of mandamus notwithstanding the answer and return filed by the respondent and same having been duly considered, and the respondent having averred in his return to the alternative writ issued herein that if a bail bond executed by one or more good and sufficient sureties, whethér the same are individual persons, or a qualified bonding company, con *692 ditioned for the appearance of the relator before the Criminal Court of Record for Hillsborough County, Florida, at 9 o’clock in the forenoon, on Thursday, February 20th, A. D. 1930, and from day to day and from term to term, that he will approve the same and release the relator in conformity with the command of the said alternative writ of mandamus, it is thereupon ordered by the Court that the said motion' for a peremptory writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon motion of counsel for relator for a peremptory writ of mandamus notwithstanding the answer and return filed by the respondent and same having been duly considered, and the respondent having averred in his return to the alternative writ issued herein that if a bail bond executed by one or more good and sufficient sureties, whethér the same are individual persons, or a qualified bonding company, con *692 ditioned for the appearance of the relator before the Criminal Court of Record for Hillsborough County, Florida, at 9 o’clock in the forenoon, on Thursday, February 20th, A. D. 1930, and from day to day and from term to term, that he will approve the same and release the relator in conformity with the command of the said alternative writ of mandamus, it is thereupon ordered by the Court that the said motion' for a peremptory writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 So. 817, 99 Fla. 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cannon-v-joughin-fla-1930.