State Ex Rel. Campbell v. Sloan

184 So. 781, 135 Fla. 179, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1529
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 28, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 184 So. 781 (State Ex Rel. Campbell v. Sloan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Campbell v. Sloan, 184 So. 781, 135 Fla. 179, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1529 (Fla. 1938).

Opinion

Buford, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. The material allegations of the alternative writ are:

“That heretofore, to-wit, on the 7th day of July, 1930, the Tax Collector of Polk County, Florida, sold to the State of Florida, the following described lands in Polk County, to-wit:

“West One-half (WJ4) of Lot Three (3) of W. j. Howey Land Company Subdivision in Sections 14, 15, 22 and 23, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, for the nonpayment of taxes assessed against it for the year 1929, and issued to the State of Florida, in pursuance of such sale, Tax Certificate No. 11585, for the year 1930.

“IV. That in and by Chapter 18296, Laws of Florida, 1937, it is provided as follows:

“ ‘That it shall be the duty of any Clerks of Circuit Courts of the State of Florida, having custody or control of any tax certificates held by the State of Florida, that are more than two years old, to offer such certificates together with all subsequent, omitted or levied taxes, for sale at public outcry to the highest and best bidder for cash, when written request is made by any person for such sale, such written request to give description of land covered by such certificate sought to be purchased.’

“V. That at the time the aforesaid Act was passed, Tax Sale Certificate No. 11585 was held by the Respondent for the State of Florida, and was more than two years old, and it was the duty of said Respondent to sell the same, upon *181 written request by any person, under said Chapter 18296, to the. highest and best bidder for cash.

“VI. That the petitioner duly made a request in writing to you, the said D. H. Sloan, Jr., as Clerk of the Circuit Court of Polk County, Florida, under the provisions of Chapter 18296, Laws of Florida, 1937, to advertise said Tax Sale Certificate No. 11585, for sale, in pursuance of the terms and provisions of said Chapter 18296.

“VII. That you, the Respondent, in pursuance of said request of the Relator, and having complied with all of the requirements of said Chapter 18296, did, on the 18th day of January, 1938, offer for sale, the aforesaid certificate, and the same was purchased by the Relator, he having been the highest and best bidder for cash.

“VIII. That thereafter, the Relator demanded of you, the Respondent, that you deliver to him the aforesaid certificate, but you, the said Respondent, failed and refused to do so.

“IX. That Relator being the highest and best bidder for cash of said certificate, and you the said Respondent having sold the same to him, it was and is the duty of you, the Respondent, to deliver said certificate to Relator.”

The return to the alternative writ alleges:

“That he admits that on or about the 7th day of July, 1930, the Tax Collector of Polk County, Florida; sold to the State of Florida, the following described land lying in Polk County, Florida, to-wit: West One-half (WJ4) ol Lot Three (3) of W. J. Howey Land Company Subdivision in Sections 14, 15, 22 and 23, Township 29 South, Range 27 East, for the non-payment of taxes assessed against it for the year 1929 and that he issued to the State of Florida Tax Sale Certificate No. 11585 for the year 1930.

“This respondent further says that the above mentioned *182 lot lies within the Peace Creek Drainage District; that such drainage district is located wholly within the limits of Polk County, Florida. That it is a corporation organized and existing under the provisions of Chapter 6458, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1913, and was organized over twenty years ago.

“This respondent further says that on account of certain work and improvements made by the Peace Creek Drainage District and its supervisors, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6458 of the Laws of Florida, Acts of 1913, there was assessed against various pieces of property in the said District, including the above mentioned tract of land, the amount of benefit that accrued to each government lot, forty acre tract or other subdivision of land in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6458, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1913.

“That by Chapter 13721, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1929, it is provided among other things:

“ ‘That the Peace Creek Drainage District of Polk County, Florida, by its Board of Supervisors, is hereby authorized, empowered and required to determine, order and levy upon all of the lands within said District against which benefits have been assessed in each year, beginning with the year 1929, all drainage taxes of said District falling due within said year, including the amount of the annual installments of the aggregate total taxes levied by the said Board of Supervisors in accordance with law to pay the costs of completion of the proposed work and improvements as shown in the plan of reclamation of said District, and to carry out the objects of said District and to pay the principal and interest of the bonds which have been or may hereafter_be, lawfully issued by said District, and including drainage taxes levied for all other purposes authorized by Sections 1467, 1493 and 1500, Compiled General Laws of Florida, *183 1927, and likewise including maintenance taxes as provided for in Section 2 of this Act and all other drainage taxes levied in accordance with law.’

“ ‘To maintain and preserve the ditches, drains and other improvements in said Peace Creek Drainage District, and to repair and restore the same when needed, and for the purpose of defraying the current expenses of the District the Board of Supervisors shall in each year beginning with the year 1929, levy a tax upon each tract or parcel of land within the District against which benefits have been assessed, to be known as a Maintenance Tax. Said Maintenance Tax shall be apportioned upon the basis of the net assessments of benefits assessed in accordance with law, shall not exceed in any one year ten per cent, of said benefits assessed.’

“ ‘It shall be the duty of the Board of County Commissioners of Polk County, Florida, to order the Tax Assessor of said County to assess, and the Tax Collector of said County to collect the amount of the annual installment and maintenance tax levied upon the lands within said District, as the same shall be certified by the Board of Supervisors of said Peace Creek Drainage District.’

“ ‘It shall be the duty of the Tax Assessor of said County to assess against each tract of land within said District, against which benefits have been assessed, as the same is certified to him each year, the taxes so levied and certified by said Board of Supervisors as hereinabove provided, and to extend the total of said taxes upon the assessment roll in a column for that purpose, and said levy shall be included in the warrant of said Tax Assessor attached to the assessment roll of taxes for said Polk County for each year.

“ ‘It shall be the duty of the Tax Collector of Polk County to collect such taxes so levied and assessed, in the same manner and at the same time as State and County taxes *184 are collected, and he shall pay the same to the Treasurer of said District, within the time prescribed for the payment over of State and County taxes.’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Arthur Kudner, Inc. v. Lee
7 So. 2d 110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Bice v. City of Haines City
195 So. 919 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Henderson v. Boose, Et Ux.
196 So. 671 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 So. 781, 135 Fla. 179, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-campbell-v-sloan-fla-1938.