State ex rel. Calvary v. Upper Arlington

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Calvary v. Upper Arlington

721 N.E.2d 119, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1473, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3847

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 21, 1999

Docket99-2240

StatusPublished

This text of 721 N.E.2d 119 (State ex rel. Calvary v. Upper Arlington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Calvary v. Upper Arlington, 721 N.E.2d 119, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1473, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3847 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon [1474]*1474consideration of relator’s motion to expedite consideration,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ of mandamus on the public records claim be, and hereby is, granted, and that the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within twenty days of this entry; relator shall file her merit brief within twenty days after filing of evidence; respondents shall file their brief within twenty days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that relator’s request for an alternative writ barring respondent Upper Arlington City Council from proceeding to consider approval of any ordinance authorizing collective bargaining agreement between the city and the union be, and hereby is, denied.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., would grant a peremptory writ regarding the agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon [1474]*1474consideration of relator’s motion to expedite consideration,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ of mandamus on the public records claim be, and hereby is, granted, and that the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within twenty days of this entry; relator shall file her merit brief within twenty days after filing of evidence; respondents shall file their brief within twenty days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that relator’s request for an alternative writ barring respondent Upper Arlington City Council from proceeding to consider approval of any ordinance authorizing collective bargaining agreement between the city and the union be, and hereby is, denied.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., would grant a peremptory writ regarding the agreement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

721 N.E.2d 119, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1473, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-calvary-v-upper-arlington-ohio-1999.