State ex rel. Cable v. Tahash

152 N.W.2d 308, 277 Minn. 503, 1967 Minn. LEXIS 970
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 14, 1967·No. No. 40,453·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

Applying the rules established in State ex rel. Roy v. Tahash, 277 Minn. 238, 152 N. W. (2d) 301, the petition appears to sufficiently allege some facts which, if proved, would entitle petitioner to relief, thus precluding a summary disposition. The decision of the trial court must, therefore, be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with our supervening postconviction-remedy statute, Minn. St. 590.01, et seq.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Cable v. Tahash, 152 N.W.2d 308, 277 Minn. 503, 1967 Minn. LEXIS 970 (Mich. 1967).

152 N.W.2d 308 (State ex rel. Cable v. Tahash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cable v. State
169 N.W.2d 391 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1969)
State ex rel. Riggers v. Tahash
152 N.W.2d 476 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
State Ex Rel. Roy v. Tahash
152 N.W.2d 301 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
State ex rel. Chapman v. Tahash
152 N.W.2d 309 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
State ex rel. Saum v. Tahash
152 N.W.2d 309 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
State ex rel. Ingham v. Tahash
152 N.W.2d 308 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
State v. Tahash
152 N.W.2d 308 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)