State ex rel. Bush v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Bush v. State

577 So. 2d 40, 1991 La. LEXIS 975, 1991 WL 53992

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 10, 1991

DocketNo. 91-KH-0710

StatusPublished

This text of 577 So. 2d 40 (State ex rel. Bush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Bush v. State, 577 So. 2d 40, 1991 La. LEXIS 975, 1991 WL 53992 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Bush, Jerome; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 234-722.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of transcripts he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bush, Jerome; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 234-722.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of transcripts he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 So. 2d 40, 1991 La. LEXIS 975, 1991 WL 53992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bush-v-state-la-1991.