State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Welter

296 N.W. 582, 209 Minn. 499, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 891
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 7, 1941
DocketNo. 32,851.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 296 N.W. 582 (State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Welter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Welter, 296 N.W. 582, 209 Minn. 499, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 891 (Mich. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This matter is before us upon our alternative writ, in the nature of quo warranto, to test the right of respondents to hold respectively the offices of judge and clerk of the municipal court for the village of Perham.

The attempt to establish that court was made by Ex. Sess. L. 1933-1934, c. 35. Minn. Const. art. 6, § 1, requires a two-thirds vote of *500 the legislature to establish such a court. It appears from the journal of the senate, Senate Journal, Ex. Sess. 1933-1931, page 291, that the bill in question did not have on its supposed passage the favorable vote of two-thirds of the senate. (It had the affirmative vote of only 10 out of 67 members of the senate.) Therefore it never became law and is a nullity. State ex rel. Eastland v. Gould, 31 Minn. 189, 17 N. W. 276.

Therefore a writ of ouster must issue.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Marckel Co. v. Zitzow
15 N.W.2d 777 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 N.W. 582, 209 Minn. 499, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-burnquist-v-welter-minn-1941.