State ex rel. Buoscio v. Horrigan

941 N.E.2d 801, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1543
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 16, 2011
Docket2010-2118
StatusPublished

This text of 941 N.E.2d 801 (State ex rel. Buoscio v. Horrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Buoscio v. Horrigan, 941 N.E.2d 801, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1543 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On complaint in mandamus of Samuel Buoscio. On S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.5 determination, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
941 N.E.2d 801, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-buoscio-v-horrigan-ohio-2011.