State ex rel. Buchanan County v. Evans

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Buchanan County v. Evans

145 S.W. 48, 240 Mo. 121, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 117

DecidedFebruary 9, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.W. 48 (State ex rel. Buchanan County v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Buchanan County v. Evans, 145 S.W. 48, 240 Mo. 121, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 117 (Mo. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, J.

This ease involves a part of the same questions involved in the case of State ex rel. Randolph County v. Evans, decided at this term. In this case the State Superintendent of Schools admits that the enumeration of the St. Joseph School District for the year 1911 is correct, but charges that in previous years they were excessively fraudulent, and that said school district by reason of such frauds had received more than it is entitled to receive for the year 1911, and for that reason he declined to apportion to It any funds for the year 1911. The opinion in the Randolph County case should be read in connection with this case. For the reasons given in the Randolph County case, supra, page 95, the motion to strike out in this case should be sustained and it is so ordered.

Valliant, C. J., Woodson and Ferriss, JJ., concur; Lamm, Kennish and Brown, JJ., concur in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, J.

This ease involves a part of the same questions involved in the case of State ex rel. Randolph County v. Evans, decided at this term. In this case the State Superintendent of Schools admits that the enumeration of the St. Joseph School District for the year 1911 is correct, but charges that in previous years they were excessively fraudulent, and that said school district by reason of such frauds had received more than it is entitled to receive for the year 1911, and for that reason he declined to apportion to It any funds for the year 1911. The opinion in the Randolph County case should be read in connection with this case. For the reasons given in the Randolph County case, supra, page 95, the motion to strike out in this case should be sustained and it is so ordered.

Valliant, C. J., Woodson and Ferriss, JJ., concur; Lamm, Kennish and Brown, JJ., concur in result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 S.W. 48, 240 Mo. 121, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-buchanan-county-v-evans-mo-1912.