State ex rel. Brown v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Brown v. Williams

998 N.E.2d 508, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1408

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2013·No. 2013-1480·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

It is further ordered that respondent’s motion to declare relator a vexatious litigator is granted. Michael E. Brown is found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(B). Accordingly, it is ordered by the court that Michael E. Brown is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the [1409] clerk of this court for the court’s review.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

It is further ordered that respondent’s motion to declare relator a vexatious litigator is granted. Michael E. Brown is found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(B). Accordingly, it is ordered by the court that Michael E. Brown is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the [1409] clerk of this court for the court’s review.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Brown v. Williams, 998 N.E.2d 508, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1408 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

998 N.E.2d 508 (State ex rel. Brown v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.