State ex rel. Brown v. Superior Court

46 P. 232, 15 Wash. 314, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 186
Washington Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 1896·No. No. 2279·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to entertain an appeal from a justice of the peace. Although several objections are urged against granting the writ, we find it necessary to pass upon one of them only, and that is the delay of relators in making the application.

The ruling of the respondent complained of was made on the 11th day of February last, while the first move made in this court was on June 25th. It was incumbent on the relators to proceed diligently in order to obtain” relief by mandamus, and the delay of four months alone would require a denial of their petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Brown v. Superior Court, 46 P. 232, 15 Wash. 314, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 186 (Wash. 1896).

46 P. 232 (State ex rel. Brown v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopp v. Peninsula School District No. 401
585 P.2d 801 (Washington Supreme Court, 1978)
State v. Vinther
58 P.2d 357 (Washington Supreme Court, 1936)
Deaver v. Patterson
205 P. 1044 (Washington Supreme Court, 1922)
State ex rel. Plaisie v. Cole
82 P. 749 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)