State ex rel. Brown v. Reesman

407 N.E.2d 14, 63 Ohio St. 2d 130, 17 Ohio Op. 3d 79, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 797
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 16, 1980·No. No. 80-412·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator’s reliance on State, ex rel. Devine, v. Hoermle (1959), 168 Ohio St. 461, is misplaced due to the factual differences between that case and the present action. In Hoermle, supra, the charter granted city council the unrestricted power to fill council vacancies. There was no time limitation placed on council’s power. In this case, however, the Wooster charter grants the power for city council to act on the vacancy only within 30 days of the occurrence of the vacancy. After 30 days, R. C. 731.43 is made applicable by the terms of Section 1.04 of the charter.

Therefore, we are of the opinion that the mayor acted lawfully in appointing respondent to the vacant position in city council.

[132]*132Accordingly, respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and the writ of quo warranto is denied.

Writ denied.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Brown v. Reesman, 407 N.E.2d 14, 63 Ohio St. 2d 130, 17 Ohio Op. 3d 79, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 797 (Ohio 1980).

407 N.E.2d 14 (State ex rel. Brown v. Reesman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Branch v. Pitts
110 N.E.3d 87 (Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County, 2018)