State ex rel. Brown v. Reesman

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Brown v. Reesman

407 N.E.2d 14, 63 Ohio St. 2d 130, 17 Ohio Op. 3d 79, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 797

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 16, 1980

DocketNo. 80-412

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 407 N.E.2d 14 (State ex rel. Brown v. Reesman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Brown v. Reesman, 407 N.E.2d 14, 63 Ohio St. 2d 130, 17 Ohio Op. 3d 79, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 797 (Ohio 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator’s reliance on State, ex rel. Devine, v. Hoermle (1959), 168 Ohio St. 461, is misplaced due to the factual differences between that case and the present action. In Hoermle, supra, the charter granted city council the unrestricted power to fill council vacancies. There was no time limitation placed on council’s power. In this case, however, the Wooster charter grants the power for city council to act on the vacancy only within 30 days of the occurrence of the vacancy. After 30 days, R. C. 731.43 is made applicable by the terms of Section 1.04 of the charter.

Therefore, we are of the opinion that the mayor acted lawfully in appointing respondent to the vacant position in city council.

[132]*132Accordingly, respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and the writ of quo warranto is denied.

Writ denied.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Relator’s reliance on State, ex rel. Devine, v. Hoermle (1959), 168 Ohio St. 461, is misplaced due to the factual differences between that case and the present action. In Hoermle, supra, the charter granted city council the unrestricted power to fill council vacancies. There was no time limitation placed on council’s power. In this case, however, the Wooster charter grants the power for city council to act on the vacancy only within 30 days of the occurrence of the vacancy. After 30 days, R. C. 731.43 is made applicable by the terms of Section 1.04 of the charter.

Therefore, we are of the opinion that the mayor acted lawfully in appointing respondent to the vacant position in city council.

[132]*132Accordingly, respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and the writ of quo warranto is denied.

Writ denied.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

407 N.E.2d 14, 63 Ohio St. 2d 130, 17 Ohio Op. 3d 79, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-brown-v-reesman-ohio-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack