State ex rel. Brown v. Kirby

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Brown v. Kirby

564 So. 2d 313, 1990 La. LEXIS 1575, 1990 WL 85342

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 22, 1990

DocketNo. 89-KH-1646

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 313 (State ex rel. Brown v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Brown v. Kirby, 564 So. 2d 313, 1990 La. LEXIS 1575, 1990 WL 85342 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Brown, Curtis Jr.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 86-3748.

Denied. Although the district court record in relator’s case does not support denial of claims 2, 3, and 4 on the ground that they are repetitive, La.C.Cr.P. art. [314]*314930.4, the records in this Court, including those obtained from the district court, provide a sufficient basis for this Court’s consideration of those claims on the merits. In the interest of judicial economy, the Court has reviewed these claims and determined that, on the showing made, they lack sufficient merit to warrant post conviction relief. Moreover, relator has failed to establish the necessity for remand to the district court for further proceedings in connection with claims 1 and 5. After a review of those claims, it is concluded that they also lack merit sufficient to warrant post conviction relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brown, Curtis Jr.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 86-3748.

Denied. Although the district court record in relator’s case does not support denial of claims 2, 3, and 4 on the ground that they are repetitive, La.C.Cr.P. art. [314]*314930.4, the records in this Court, including those obtained from the district court, provide a sufficient basis for this Court’s consideration of those claims on the merits. In the interest of judicial economy, the Court has reviewed these claims and determined that, on the showing made, they lack sufficient merit to warrant post conviction relief. Moreover, relator has failed to establish the necessity for remand to the district court for further proceedings in connection with claims 1 and 5. After a review of those claims, it is concluded that they also lack merit sufficient to warrant post conviction relief.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 313, 1990 La. LEXIS 1575, 1990 WL 85342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-brown-v-kirby-la-1990.