State ex rel. Brown v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Brown v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 104, 83 Ohio St. 3d 327

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 7, 1998·No. 1996-2030·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 327.]

THE STATE EX REL. BROWN, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Brown v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-104.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2030—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 7, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD09-1261. __________________ Law Offices of Larry Hotchkiss and Scott A. Bravi, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Janet Y. Castaneda, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Ronald J. O’Brien, City Attorney, and Stephanie Mitchell Hughes, Assistant City Attorney, for appellee city of Columbus. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 327.]

THE STATE EX REL. BROWN, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Brown v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-104.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2030—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 7, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD09-1261. __________________ Law Offices of Larry Hotchkiss and Scott A. Bravi, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Janet Y. Castaneda, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Ronald J. O’Brien, City Attorney, and Stephanie Mitchell Hughes, Assistant City Attorney, for appellee city of Columbus. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. __________________

State ex rel. Brown v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 104, 83 Ohio St. 3d 327 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

1998 Ohio 104 (State ex rel. Brown v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.