State ex rel. Brown v. Franks

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Brown v. Franks

691 N.E.2d 687, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 803

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 25, 1998

Docket98-443

StatusPublished

This text of 691 N.E.2d 687 (State ex rel. Brown v. Franks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Brown v. Franks, 691 N.E.2d 687, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 803 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In Procedendo and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of procedendo and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion to expedite,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would grant ah alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Procedendo and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of procedendo and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion to expedite,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would grant ah alternative writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

691 N.E.2d 687, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-brown-v-franks-ohio-1998.