State ex rel. Brown v. Corrigan
This text of 2014 Ohio 2067 (State ex rel. Brown v. Corrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Brown v. Corrigan, 2014-Ohio-2067.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101065
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. DEMETRIUS BROWN
RELATOR
vs.
JUDGE PETER CORRIGAN RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 473367 Order No. 474148
RELEASE DATE: May 12, 2014 FOR RELATOR
Demetrius Brown, pro se No. 502-975 P.O. Box 7010 Chillicothe, Ohio 45601
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor BY: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 9th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 MARY J. BOYLE, A.J.:
{¶1} Relator, Demetrius Brown, petitions this court to compel respondent judge
to dispose of his motion for jail-time credit filed in State v. Brown, Cuyahoga C.P. No.
CR-05-464069-A, on February 3, 2014.
{¶2} Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment citing numerous
procedural deficiencies in Brown’s petition and also attaching a copy of a journal entry
issued by respondent that granted Brown’s motion for jail-time credit on February 11,
2014. Specifically, respondent asserts that Brown failed to comply with the
requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C), Civ.R. 10, Loc.App.R. 45, and R.C. 2969.25. Relator
has not opposed respondent’s motion. Respondent’s motion for summary judgment is
granted based on the procedural deficiencies in Brown’s petition. Further, Brown is not
entitled to a writ of procedendo because the action is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v.
Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d
723; State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).
{¶3} Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment
and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
Writ denied.
_____________________________________________ MARY J. BOYLE, ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J., and TIM McCORMACK, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 2067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-brown-v-corrigan-ohioctapp-2014.