State ex rel. Brown v. Bernard

849 N.E.2d 43, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1499
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 9, 2006·No. 2006-0989·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion to expedite a ruling on the issuance of an alternative writ of prohibition,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Brown v. Bernard, 849 N.E.2d 43, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1499 (Ohio 2006).

849 N.E.2d 43 (State ex rel. Brown v. Bernard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.