State ex rel. Broussard v. Gauthe

256 So. 2d 610, 260 La. 598, 1972 La. LEXIS 5881
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 3, 1972
DocketNo. 52106
StatusPublished

This text of 256 So. 2d 610 (State ex rel. Broussard v. Gauthe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Broussard v. Gauthe, 256 So. 2d 610, 260 La. 598, 1972 La. LEXIS 5881 (La. 1972).

Opinion

In re: Harold Gauthe applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Writ denied. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our [599]*599supervisory jurisdiction at this time. In the event of an adverse judgment in the trial court applicant’s remedy is by appeal.

BARHAM, J., concurs in the denial on the ground that relator should have applied to the Court of Appeal.

That Court may consider and act to review this interlocutory order upon a finding of palpable error and irreparable injury. Relator’s remedy is by application to the proper court for relief and we cannot here deny that jurisdiction which is vested in the Court of Appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 So. 2d 610, 260 La. 598, 1972 La. LEXIS 5881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-broussard-v-gauthe-la-1972.