State ex rel. Broussard v. Gauthe
This text of 256 So. 2d 610 (State ex rel. Broussard v. Gauthe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: Harold Gauthe applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.
Writ denied. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our [599]*599supervisory jurisdiction at this time. In the event of an adverse judgment in the trial court applicant’s remedy is by appeal.
That Court may consider and act to review this interlocutory order upon a finding of palpable error and irreparable injury. Relator’s remedy is by application to the proper court for relief and we cannot here deny that jurisdiction which is vested in the Court of Appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 So. 2d 610, 260 La. 598, 1972 La. LEXIS 5881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-broussard-v-gauthe-la-1972.