Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas

State ex rel. Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas

744 N.E.2d 1193, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 921
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 2, 2001
Docket01-314
StatusPublished

This text of 744 N.E.2d 1193 (State ex rel. Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Bristow v. Crawford Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 744 N.E.2d 1193, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 921 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of respondent’s answer and on determination pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any new cases from Lonny Lee Bristow without the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
744 N.E.2d 1193, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bristow-v-crawford-cty-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-2001.