State Ex Rel. Bridges v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Bridges v. District Court

97 P.2d 1119, 108 Mont. 608, 1939 Mont. LEXIS 119

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 6, 1939

DocketNo. 7,956.

StatusPublished

This text of 97 P.2d 1119 (State Ex Rel. Bridges v. District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Bridges v. District Court, 97 P.2d 1119, 108 Mont. 608, 1939 Mont. LEXIS 119 (Mo. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— This court having heretofore, to-wit, on March 7, 1,939, granted an order to show cause why a writ of supervisory control should not issue to review the action of the district court of Gallatin county and the Honorable Benjamin E. Berg, Judge thereof, in refusing to grant a motion to quash service of summons made by defendant in that certain action entitled J. A. Bridges v. Doughnot Corporation of Montana, and relator having filed a praecipe of dismissal, the cause having been fully settled on the merits, it is ordered that the cause be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

— This court having heretofore, to-wit, on March 7, 1,939, granted an order to show cause why a writ of supervisory control should not issue to review the action of the district court of Gallatin county and the Honorable Benjamin E. Berg, Judge thereof, in refusing to grant a motion to quash service of summons made by defendant in that certain action entitled J. A. Bridges v. Doughnot Corporation of Montana, and relator having filed a praecipe of dismissal, the cause having been fully settled on the merits, it is ordered that the cause be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 P.2d 1119, 108 Mont. 608, 1939 Mont. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bridges-v-district-court-mont-1939.