State ex rel. Brennan v. Walbridge

22 S.W. 893, 116 Mo. 656, 1893 Mo. LEXIS 324
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided June 19, 1893·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

The crowded condition of the docket of this court makes it necessary for us to adhere to the rule heretofore declared that this court will not entertain applications for extraordinary remedies where the applications can be made to the circuit court in the first instance, unless the case is one of more than ordi[657] nary magnitude and importance. (64 Mo. 170.) An examination of the petition filed in this case shows that the circuit court has the power to issue the writ of certiorari prayed for, and the case is not one of more than ordinary importance. Eor these reasons the writ is denied.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Brennan v. Walbridge, 22 S.W. 893, 116 Mo. 656, 1893 Mo. LEXIS 324 (Mo. 1893).

22 S.W. 893 (State ex rel. Brennan v. Walbridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Duraflor Products Co. v. Pearcy
29 S.W.2d 83 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1930)
State Ex Rel. Gardner v. Hall
221 S.W. 708 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1920)
Tebbetts v. Rickart
158 S.W. 843 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1913)
State ex rel. Parker-Washington Co. v. Jones
44 S.W. 224 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
State ex rel. Walbridge v. Valliant
27 S.W. 379 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)