STATE EX REL. BREHE-KRUEGER v. Garth

Missouri Court of Appeals

STATE EX REL. BREHE-KRUEGER v. Garth

303 S.W.3d 656, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 209, 2010 WL 624040

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketED 93109

StatusPublished

This text of 303 S.W.3d 656 (STATE EX REL. BREHE-KRUEGER v. Garth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

STATE EX REL. BREHE-KRUEGER v. Garth, 303 S.W.3d 656, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 209, 2010 WL 624040 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Grant Garth appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 74.05 motion to set aside the default judgment of the Circuit Court of Gasconade County, which ordered forfeiture of the property located at 2705 Riverview Drive pursuant to Missouri’s Criminal Activities Forfeiture Act, section 513.600 et seq. RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Grant Garth appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 74.05 motion to set aside the default judgment of the Circuit Court of Gasconade County, which ordered forfeiture of the property located at 2705 Riverview Drive pursuant to Missouri’s Criminal Activities Forfeiture Act, section 513.600 et seq. RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 S.W.3d 656, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 209, 2010 WL 624040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-brehe-krueger-v-garth-moctapp-2010.