State ex rel. Bradley v. Selvaggio
783 N.E.2d 516, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1456
This text of 783 N.E.2d 516 (State ex rel. Bradley v. Selvaggio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Bradley v. Selvaggio, 783 N.E.2d 516, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1456 (Ohio 2003).
Opinion
In Mandamus. On answer of respondents Nick A. Selvaggio and James R. Smith, motion for judgment on pleadings of Nick A. Selvaggio and James R. Smith, motion to dismiss of Richard E. Nau, Esq., and motion for judgment on pleadings of Kevin Bradley. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
783 N.E.2d 516, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bradley-v-selvaggio-ohio-2003.