State ex rel. Bradford v. Heskett
This text of 100 Ohio St. (N.S.) 338 (State ex rel. Bradford v. Heskett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In determining whether an additional allowance shall be made to an officer for compensation of deputies, etc., under the provisions of Section 2980-1, General Code, while the judge of the court of common pleas, upon the hearing of an application therefor, may take into consideration the number of deputies, assistants, etc., employed or to bé employed, the character and amount of work necessary to be done, and any other matters connected therewith, for the purpose of determining whether the necessity for such additional allowance exists, the judge’s authority is limited by this.section to the fixing of an additional' aggregate sum of money in addition to the aggregate sum fixed by the county commissioners. He has no authority to specify by journal entry or otherwise what particular deputies, or at what [339]*339particular time during the ensuing year such allowance should be paid or expended.
Judgment for relator.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 Ohio St. (N.S.) 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bradford-v-heskett-ohio-1919.