State ex rel. Bowles v. Trimble

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Bowles v. Trimble

1998 Ohio 400, 82 Ohio St. 3d 387

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 22, 1998

Docket1996-0546

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 400 (State ex rel. Bowles v. Trimble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Bowles v. Trimble, 1998 Ohio 400, 82 Ohio St. 3d 387 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 387.]

THE STATE EX REL. BOWLES, APPELLANT, v. TRIMBLE, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Bowles v. Trimble, 1998-Ohio-400.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-546—Submitted June 9, 1998—Decided July 22, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD02-168. __________________ Law Offices of Ronald J. Koltak, Ronald J. Koltak and Peter J. Gibson, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Lisa A. Sotos, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 387.]

THE STATE EX REL. BOWLES, APPELLANT, v. TRIMBLE, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Bowles v. Trimble, 1998-Ohio-400.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-546—Submitted June 9, 1998—Decided July 22, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD02-168. __________________ Law Offices of Ronald J. Koltak, Ronald J. Koltak and Peter J. Gibson, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Lisa A. Sotos, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 400, 82 Ohio St. 3d 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bowles-v-trimble-ohio-1998.