State ex rel. Boston & Montana Consol. C. & S. Mining Co. v. District Court of the Second Judicial District
This text of 69 P. 1135 (State ex rel. Boston & Montana Consol. C. & S. Mining Co. v. District Court of the Second Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing from the original and supplemental answers made to the alternative writs of mandate heretofore issued herein that the defendant has fully complied with the requirements of said writs in both hearing and determining the matters which it was sought by said writs to have heard and determined, but that no sufficient or any excuse is furnished why said matters were not heard and determined before the said writs were applied for and issued; it is ordered that the writs be discharged at the cost of the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 P. 1135, 25 Mont. 566, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-boston-montana-consol-c-s-mining-co-v-district-court-mont-1901.