State ex rel. Borger v. Cissell

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Borger v. Cissell

735 N.E.2d 900, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1422, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2332

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 25, 2000

Docket00-1193

StatusPublished

This text of 735 N.E.2d 900 (State ex rel. Borger v. Cissell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Borger v. Cissell, 735 N.E.2d 900, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1422, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2332 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. On September 19, 2000, relator filed a request for an extension of time to file evidence and motion for an oral hearing with witnesses. Whereas a motion for hearing is not a permissible filing by facsimile pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1XB)(1),

[1423]*1423IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for an oral hearing with witnesses be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the time for filing evidence is hereby extended to September 29, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On September 19, 2000, relator filed a request for an extension of time to file evidence and motion for an oral hearing with witnesses. Whereas a motion for hearing is not a permissible filing by facsimile pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1XB)(1),

[1423]*1423IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for an oral hearing with witnesses be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the time for filing evidence is hereby extended to September 29, 2000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

735 N.E.2d 900, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1422, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-borger-v-cissell-ohio-2000.