State ex rel. Borden Co. v. Langley

184 So. 2d 161, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3767
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 1966
DocketNo. 34685
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 184 So. 2d 161 (State ex rel. Borden Co. v. Langley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Borden Co. v. Langley, 184 So. 2d 161, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3767 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

Revised Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is here on the suggestion of the State of Florida, the Borden Company, a New Jersey corporation, relator, for a writ of prohibition to the Florida Milk Commission.

Because the petition and response filed herein pose a controversy which more appropriately should be adjudicated by a District Court of Appeal, we decline to assume jurisdiction.

The relator has invoked original as distinguished from our appellate jurisdiction and, consequently, we cannot transfer the cause.

The suggestion for prohibition is denied but without prejudice to the relator to proceed as it may be advised in the appropriate District Court of Appeal.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Soodhalter v. Baker
248 So. 2d 468 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
State ex rel. Carter v. Florida Industrial Commission
28 Fla. Supp. 143 (Leon County Circuit Court, 1967)
State Ex Rel. Sentinel Star Company v. Lambeth
192 So. 2d 518 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Johnson v. State
184 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 So. 2d 161, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-borden-co-v-langley-fla-1966.