State Ex Rel. Boone v. Gray

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Boone v. Gray

169 So. 611, 125 Fla. 104

DecidedAugust 1, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 169 So. 611 (State Ex Rel. Boone v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Boone v. Gray, 169 So. 611, 125 Fla. 104 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The relator’s “petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus requiring the Respondent to recall from the Board of County Commissioners from the several Counties, the statement that Relator’s campaign expense statement was not received and filed within the period required by statute and that said Secretary of State, the *105 Respondent herein, should be required to immediately notify all County Commissioners of the several counties that your Relator was properly qualified and his name should be printed upon the official ballot of the primary election for August 11, 1936” is denied. There is no showing of a legal duty of the respondent Secretary of State to perform the acts stated in the prayer of the petition for an alternative writ of mandamus.

Petition denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— The relator’s “petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus requiring the Respondent to recall from the Board of County Commissioners from the several Counties, the statement that Relator’s campaign expense statement was not received and filed within the period required by statute and that said Secretary of State, the *105 Respondent herein, should be required to immediately notify all County Commissioners of the several counties that your Relator was properly qualified and his name should be printed upon the official ballot of the primary election for August 11, 1936” is denied. There is no showing of a legal duty of the respondent Secretary of State to perform the acts stated in the prayer of the petition for an alternative writ of mandamus.

Petition denied.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 So. 611, 125 Fla. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-boone-v-gray-fla-1936.