State ex rel. Bonifield v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 1998 Ohio 135 (State ex rel. Bonifield v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 117.]
THE STATE EX REL. BONIFIELD, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Bonifield v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-135.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-532—Submitted July 15, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD05-622. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Constance A. Snyder, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Bricker & Eckler, Charles D. Smith and Elizabeth A. Preston, for appellee H.C.F., Inc. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. RESNICK, J., disents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1998 Ohio 135, 83 Ohio St. 3d 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-bonifield-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.